Skip to main content

Toward a third sector AI policy


There have been some good attempts by organisations and individuals at developing policies on AI for third sector organisations. Some of the fundamental challenges that have been difficult to capture is the rapid evolution of AI. This rapid pace of AI development, particularly the potential for artificial general intelligence (AGI) by 2027/28 as suggested by scaling laws, poses significant challenges for charities in keeping their policies up-to-date. Here are some key considerations which may be of use to your organisation:


Establish Principles and Ethical Frameworks

Charities should establish clear principles and ethical frameworks to guide their use of AI, rather than relying solely on specific use cases or technical details that may quickly become outdated. These principles should align with the charity's mission, values, and commitment to beneficiaries, while addressing issues like transparency, accountability, privacy, and bias.[1][3]


Adopt Agile and Iterative Policymaking

Given the rapid evolution of AI, charities should adopt an agile and iterative approach to policymaking. Policies should be regularly reviewed and updated to account for new developments, risks, and opportunities presented by AI advances. This could involve establishing AI advisory committees or working groups to continuously monitor the landscape.[1][4]


Emphasize Human Oversight and Control

As AI systems become more advanced and autonomous, it will be crucial for charities to maintain meaningful human oversight and control. Policies should clearly delineate decision-making processes that involve AI, ensuring that ultimate responsibility and accountability remain with human decision-makers, particularly when it comes to sensitive areas like service delivery or interactions with beneficiaries.[1][3]


Invest in AI Literacy and Capacity Building

Charities should invest in building AI literacy and capacity among their staff, volunteers, and trustees. This could involve training programs, partnerships with academic institutions or AI experts, and the recruitment of specialised AI talent (this may be beyond the means of many charities). A better understanding of AI capabilities and limitations will enable more informed policymaking and implementation.[3][4]


Collaborate and Engage with Stakeholders

Charities should actively collaborate and engage with a diverse range of stakeholders, including beneficiaries, regulators, policymakers, and other charities, to share best practices, identify emerging risks, and develop sector-wide standards or guidelines for responsible AI use. This collaborative approach can help ensure that policies remain relevant and aligned with broader societal expectations.[1][2]


Prioritise Ethical and Responsible AI Development

As AI systems become more advanced and capable, charities should prioritise the development and adoption of ethical and responsible AI practices. This could involve advocating for and supporting initiatives that promote the development of AI systems that are transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values and rights.[2][3]

Value alignment, ensuring that an AGI system's goals and behaviours are aligned with human values, is an immense technical and philosophical challenge that many experts believe may be extremely difficult or even impossible to solve in a short timeframe.

While the rapid pace of AI development presents challenges, proactive and adaptive policymaking, combined with a strong commitment to ethical and responsible AI practices, can help charities navigate this landscape and harness the potential of AI to further their missions and better serve their beneficiaries.


Citations:

[1] https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/regulator-tells-charities-to-consider-having-an-internal-artificial-intelligence-policy.html

[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/ai-regulation-a-pro-innovation-approach-policy-proposals/outcome/a-pro-innovation-approach-to-ai-regulation-government-response

[3] https://charitycommission.blog.gov.uk/2024/04/02/charities-and-artificial-intelligence/

[4] https://charitydigital.org.uk/topics/how-to-create-an-ai-policy-11570

[5] https://www.vonne.org.uk/ai-and-charity-sector-what-we-learned

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in
Post a Comment
Read more

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their
Post a Comment
Read more

Gemini LLM, an increase in benefits, and risks.

  Gemini LLM is being developed by Google Brain and Deepmind that was introduced at Google I/O 2023, and is expected to have a trillion parameters, like GPT-4. The project is using tens of thousands of Google's TPU AI chips for training, and could take months to complete. It may be introduced early next year. Gemini is being trained on a massive dataset of text, audio, video, images, and other media. This will allow it to 'understand' and respond to a wider range of input than previous LLMs. It will also be able to use other tools and APIs, which will make it more versatile and powerful. It's clearly looking to compete with a future GPT-5, this time Google are looking to get ahead of the curve. Training Gemini in a multimodal manner is significant because it allows the model to learn from a wider range of data. This should improve the model's accuracy and performance on a variety of tasks. For example, if Gemini is trained on both text and images, it can learn to as
Post a Comment
Read more