Skip to main content

Prompt Engineering: Expert Tips for a variety of Platforms

 


Prompt engineering has become a crucial aspect of harnessing the full potential of AI language models. Both Google and Anthropic have recently released comprehensive guides to help users optimise their prompts for better interactions with their AI tools. What follows is a quick overview of tips drawn from these documents. And to think just a year ago there were countless YouTube videos that were promoting 'Prompt Engineering' as a job that could earn megabucks...

The main providers of these 'chatbots' will hopefully get rid of this problem, soon. Currently their interfaces are akin to 1970's command lines, we've seen a regression in UI. Constructing complex prompts should be relegated to Linux lovers. Just a word of caution, even excellent prompts don't stop LLM 'hallucinations'. They can be mitigated against by supplementing a LLM with a RAG, and perhaps by 'Memory Tuning' as suggested by Lamini (I've not tested this approach yet).  

In the meantime, here's how to cope with retro interfaces.

Clear and Direct Instructions

One of the most critical aspects of prompt engineering is to provide clear and direct instructions. This ensures that the AI model understands the task at hand and can generate relevant and coherent responses. For instance, when using Anthropic's Claude, it is essential to describe your task in detail, specifying exactly what you want the model to accomplish.


Separating Data from Instructions

Another key technique is to separate data from instructions. This helps the model to differentiate between the input data and the specific actions it needs to perform on that data. This approach is particularly useful when working with complex tasks that require multiple steps[4].


Using XML Tags

XML tags can be used to mark different parts of your prompt, which helps the AI model to recognize the structure and organization of the input. This is especially useful when dealing with tasks that require specific formatting or identification of certain elements within the text.

Including examples in your prompt can significantly improve the model's performance. The more examples you provide, the better the model can understand the task and generate relevant outputs. This approach is particularly effective when working with tasks that require specific formats or styles


Long Context

Using long context can be beneficial when working with tasks that require a deeper understanding of the input. Anthropic's Claude, for example, can process up to 100,000 tokens, allowing for more detailed and nuanced prompts. The average prompt is, apparently only 9 words long, 21 words is considered to be the minimum that's sufficient.


Avoiding Hallucinations

Hallucinations occur when the AI model generates information that is not present in the input data. To avoid this, it is essential to ensure that your prompts are specific and well-defined, and that you provide enough context for the model to understand the task accurately.


Building Complex Prompts

Building complex prompts involves combining multiple techniques and approaches to create a comprehensive and detailed prompt. This can be particularly useful when working with tasks that require multiple steps or involve complex data analysis.


Experimentation and Refining

Finally, it is crucial to experiment with different prompts and refine them based on the model's responses. This iterative process helps to identify the most effective prompts and optimize them for better performance.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Future of Work in the Age of AGI: Opportunities, Challenges, and Resistance

 In recent years, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked intense debate about the future of work. As we edge closer to the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI), these discussions have taken on a new urgency. This post explores various perspectives on employment in a post-AGI world, including the views of those who may resist such changes. It follows on from others I've written on the impacts of these technologies. The Potential for Widespread Job Displacement Avital Balwit, an employee at Anthropic, argues in her article " My Last Five Years of Work " that AGI is likely to cause significant job displacement across various sectors, including knowledge-based professions. This aligns with research by Korinek (2024), which suggests that the transition to AGI could trigger a race between automation and capital accumulation, potentially leading to a collapse in wages for many workers. Emerging Opportunities and Challenges Despite the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can We Build a Safe Superintelligence? Safe Superintelligence Inc. Raises Intriguing Questions

  Safe Superintelligence Inc . (SSI) has burst onto the scene with a bold mission: to create the world's first safe superintelligence (SSI). Their (Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy) ambition is undeniable, but before we all sign up to join their "cracked team," let's delve deeper into the potential issues with their approach. One of the most critical questions is defining "safe" superintelligence. What values would guide this powerful AI? How can we ensure it aligns with the complex and often contradictory desires of humanity?  After all, "safe" for one person might mean environmental protection, while another might prioritise economic growth, even if it harms the environment.  Finding universal values that a superintelligence could adhere to is a significant hurdle that SSI hasn't fully addressed. Another potential pitfall lies in SSI's desire to rapidly advance capabilities while prioritising safety.  Imagine a Formula One car wi...
Post a Comment
Read more