Skip to main content

Prompt Engineering: Expert Tips for a variety of Platforms

 


Prompt engineering has become a crucial aspect of harnessing the full potential of AI language models. Both Google and Anthropic have recently released comprehensive guides to help users optimise their prompts for better interactions with their AI tools. What follows is a quick overview of tips drawn from these documents. And to think just a year ago there were countless YouTube videos that were promoting 'Prompt Engineering' as a job that could earn megabucks...

The main providers of these 'chatbots' will hopefully get rid of this problem, soon. Currently their interfaces are akin to 1970's command lines, we've seen a regression in UI. Constructing complex prompts should be relegated to Linux lovers. Just a word of caution, even excellent prompts don't stop LLM 'hallucinations'. They can be mitigated against by supplementing a LLM with a RAG, and perhaps by 'Memory Tuning' as suggested by Lamini (I've not tested this approach yet).  

In the meantime, here's how to cope with retro interfaces.

Clear and Direct Instructions

One of the most critical aspects of prompt engineering is to provide clear and direct instructions. This ensures that the AI model understands the task at hand and can generate relevant and coherent responses. For instance, when using Anthropic's Claude, it is essential to describe your task in detail, specifying exactly what you want the model to accomplish.


Separating Data from Instructions

Another key technique is to separate data from instructions. This helps the model to differentiate between the input data and the specific actions it needs to perform on that data. This approach is particularly useful when working with complex tasks that require multiple steps[4].


Using XML Tags

XML tags can be used to mark different parts of your prompt, which helps the AI model to recognize the structure and organization of the input. This is especially useful when dealing with tasks that require specific formatting or identification of certain elements within the text.

Including examples in your prompt can significantly improve the model's performance. The more examples you provide, the better the model can understand the task and generate relevant outputs. This approach is particularly effective when working with tasks that require specific formats or styles


Long Context

Using long context can be beneficial when working with tasks that require a deeper understanding of the input. Anthropic's Claude, for example, can process up to 100,000 tokens, allowing for more detailed and nuanced prompts. The average prompt is, apparently only 9 words long, 21 words is considered to be the minimum that's sufficient.


Avoiding Hallucinations

Hallucinations occur when the AI model generates information that is not present in the input data. To avoid this, it is essential to ensure that your prompts are specific and well-defined, and that you provide enough context for the model to understand the task accurately.


Building Complex Prompts

Building complex prompts involves combining multiple techniques and approaches to create a comprehensive and detailed prompt. This can be particularly useful when working with tasks that require multiple steps or involve complex data analysis.


Experimentation and Refining

Finally, it is crucial to experiment with different prompts and refine them based on the model's responses. This iterative process helps to identify the most effective prompts and optimize them for better performance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...

Podcast Soon Notice

I've been invited to make a podcast around the themes and ideas presented in this blog. More details will be announced soon. This is also your opportunity to be involved in the debate. If you have a response to any of the blog posts posted here, or consider an important issue in the debate around AGI is not being discussed, then please get in touch via the comments.  I look forward to hearing from you.

AI Agents and the Latest Silicon Valley Hype

In what appears to be yet another grandiose proclamation from the tech industry, Google has released a whitepaper extolling the virtues of what they're calling "Generative AI agents". (https://www.aibase.com/news/14498) Whilst the basic premise—distinguishing between AI models and agents—holds water, one must approach these sweeping claims with considerable caution. Let's begin with the fundamentals. Yes, AI models like Large Language Models do indeed process information and generate outputs. That much isn't controversial. However, the leap from these essentially sophisticated pattern-matching systems to autonomous "agents" requires rather more scrutiny than the tech evangelists would have us believe. The whitepaper's architectural approaches—with their rather grandiose names like "ReAct" and "Tree of Thought"—sound remarkably like repackaged versions of long-standing computer science concepts, dressed up in fashionable AI clot...