Skip to main content

Intel and the gamble for good

 


The Aurora supercomputer, a joint project between Argonne National Laboratory, Intel, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, is expected to be completed in 2023. Aurora will be one of the first exascale supercomputers, capable of performing more than 1 quintillion calculations per second. The anticipated usage includes:

Materials science: Aurora will be used to design new materials with improved properties, such as strength, lightness, and conductivity. This could lead to new technologies in areas such as energy, transportation, and medicine.

Drug discovery: Aurora will be used to accelerate the discovery of new drugs by simulating the behavior of molecules and proteins. This could lead to new treatments for cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and other diseases.

Climate science: Aurora will be used to improve our understanding of climate change by simulating the Earth's atmosphere and oceans. This could help us to develop more effective strategies for mitigating and adapting to climate change.

Aurora is a major investment in the future of scientific discovery. It will enable scientists to make new discoveries that could improve our lives in many ways. It cab also be applied for different purposes too.

In addition to its impressive speed, Aurora will also feature a number of other innovations that will make it a powerful tool for scientific research. These include:

  • A large-scale generative AI model: This model will be trained on a massive dataset of scientific data and code. It may be able to generate new ideas and hypotheses, and to suggest new experiments.
  • A high-performance storage system: This system will be able to store and access large amounts of data quickly and efficiently. This will allow scientists to run large-scale simulations and to analyse large datasets.
  • A high-speed network: This network will allow Aurora to communicate with other supercomputers and data centers around the world. This will allow scientists to collaborate on projects and to access the latest research data.
This is just one of the AI systems I'd expect the UK Labour party wish to see 'licensed like medicines or nuclear power', It depends on how Aurora is licensed, it could open up scientific discovery significantly if it was able to lower the costs of access, which will be extremely prohibitive, once the system is launched. Or it could merely be just another exercise in having external auditors checking effectively black box systems, declaring that the processes are in order and that all possible risks have been mitigated against, even though that's not knowable. Medicines may be licensed, but it doesn't stop the risk of side effects or mis-diagnosis. 

The nuclear industry is even more strictly licensed, it doesn't stop Three Mile Island, Windscale, Chernobyl or Fukushima. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster was a wake-up call for the nuclear industry. It showed that even well-designed and operated nuclear plants are at risk of disaster if they are not properly prepared for extreme events. The difference with a potential AI disaster though, if we are to accept the word of many in the industry, is that should 'a once in a million year type risk' occur there may be few of us left around for a second chance.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can We Build a Safe Superintelligence? Safe Superintelligence Inc. Raises Intriguing Questions

  Safe Superintelligence Inc . (SSI) has burst onto the scene with a bold mission: to create the world's first safe superintelligence (SSI). Their (Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy) ambition is undeniable, but before we all sign up to join their "cracked team," let's delve deeper into the potential issues with their approach. One of the most critical questions is defining "safe" superintelligence. What values would guide this powerful AI? How can we ensure it aligns with the complex and often contradictory desires of humanity?  After all, "safe" for one person might mean environmental protection, while another might prioritise economic growth, even if it harms the environment.  Finding universal values that a superintelligence could adhere to is a significant hurdle that SSI hasn't fully addressed. Another potential pitfall lies in SSI's desire to rapidly advance capabilities while prioritising safety.  Imagine a Formula One car wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI Agents and the Latest Silicon Valley Hype

In what appears to be yet another grandiose proclamation from the tech industry, Google has released a whitepaper extolling the virtues of what they're calling "Generative AI agents". (https://www.aibase.com/news/14498) Whilst the basic premise—distinguishing between AI models and agents—holds water, one must approach these sweeping claims with considerable caution. Let's begin with the fundamentals. Yes, AI models like Large Language Models do indeed process information and generate outputs. That much isn't controversial. However, the leap from these essentially sophisticated pattern-matching systems to autonomous "agents" requires rather more scrutiny than the tech evangelists would have us believe. The whitepaper's architectural approaches—with their rather grandiose names like "ReAct" and "Tree of Thought"—sound remarkably like repackaged versions of long-standing computer science concepts, dressed up in fashionable AI clot...
Post a Comment
Read more