Skip to main content

Harari on AI and the future of humanity


I have seen a few discussions and lectures from Harari on the subject of AI, this though may be the best so far. The questions are pointed, which certainly helps. Harari tends to bring a different perspective to the debate on AI safety, which is of value. It's well worth watching the whole video, below is a snippet. 


Harari: So, we need to know three things about AI. First of all, AI is still just a tiny baby. We haven't seen anything yet. Real AI, deployed into the world, not in a laboratory or in science fiction, is only about 10 years old.

If you look at the wonderful scenery outside, with all the plants and trees, and think about biological evolution, the evolution of life on Earth took something like 4 billion years. It took 4 billion years to reach these plants and to reach us, human beings.

Now, AI is at the stage of, I don't know, amoebas. It's like 4 billion years ago, and the first living organisms are crawling out of the organic soup. ChatGPT and all these wonders are the amoebas of the AI world.

What would a T-Rex look like, and how long would it take for the AI amoebas to evolve into T-Rexes? It won't take billions of years. Maybe it will only take a few decades or a few years.

That's because the evolution of AI is on a completely different timescale than the evolution of organic beings. AI itself works on a different timescale. AI is always on. Computers in general are always on. Humans and other organic organisms live, exist, and develop in cycles. We need to rest sometimes. AI never needs to rest.

Now, the other two things we need to know about AI are that:

It is the first technology ever that can make decisions by itself.

I hear a lot of people saying, "Oh, all these worries about AI. Every time there is a new technology, people worry about it, and afterwards it's okay. Like when people invented writing, printing presses, and airplanes, they were so worried, and in the end it was okay. This will be the same."

But it's not the same. No previous technology in history could make decisions. Even an atom bomb actually empowered humans, because an atom bomb can destroy a city, but it cannot decide which city to bomb. You always need a human to make that decision. AI is the first technology that can make decisions by itself, even about us.

Increasingly, when we apply to a bank for a loan, it is an AI that makes the decision about us. So it takes power away from us.

AI is the first technology ever that can create new ideas.

The printing press, radio, and television broadcast and spread ideas created by the human brain, by the human mind. They cannot create a new idea. For example, Gutenberg printed the Bible in the middle of the 15th century. The printing press printed as many copies of the Bible as Gutenberg instructed it to, but it did not create a single new page. It had no ideas of its own about the Bible, such as whether it is good or bad, or how to interpret it.

AI can create new ideas, and can even write a new Bible. Throughout history, religions have dreamed about having a book written by a superhuman intelligence, by a non-human entity. Every religion claims that its book is the only true book, and that all the other books are written by humans, but our book is different. Our book came from some superhuman intelligence.

In a few years, there might be religions that are actually correct. Just think about a religion whose holy book is written by an AI. That could be a reality in a few years.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...
Post a Comment
Read more

OpenAI's NSA Appointment Raises Alarming Surveillance Concerns

  The recent appointment of General Paul Nakasone, former head of the National Security Agency (NSA), to OpenAI's board of directors has sparked widespread outrage and concern among privacy advocates and tech enthusiasts alike. Nakasone, who led the NSA from 2018 to 2023, will join OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee, tasked with enhancing AI's role in cybersecurity. However, this move has raised significant red flags, particularly given the NSA's history of mass surveillance and data collection without warrants. Critics, including Edward Snowden, have voiced their concerns that OpenAI's AI capabilities could be leveraged to strengthen the NSA's snooping network, further eroding individual privacy. Snowden has gone so far as to label the appointment a "willful, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth." The tech community is rightly alarmed, with many drawing parallels to dystopian fiction. The move has also raised questions about ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hidden Environmental Cost of AI: Data Centres' Surging Energy and Water Consumption

 In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of our daily lives, powering everything from smart assistants to complex data analysis. However, as AI technologies continue to advance and proliferate, a concerning trend has emerged: the rapidly increasing energy and water consumption of data centres that support these systems. The Power Hunger of AI According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global data centre electricity demand is projected to more than double between 2022 and 2026, largely due to the growth of AI. In 2022, data centres consumed approximately 460 terawatt-hours (TWh) globally, and this figure is expected to exceed 1,000 TWh by 2026. To put this into perspective, that's equivalent to the entire electricity consumption of Japan. The energy intensity of AI-related queries is particularly striking. While a typical Google search uses about 0.3 watt-hours (Wh), a query using ChatGPT requires around 2.9 Wh - nearly ten times more en...
Post a Comment
Read more