Skip to main content

Working hypothesis, after a week of peering down the AGI rabbit hole.

Working hypothesis, after a week of peering down the AGI rabbit hole.



I started this blog to chart and comment on the rapid changes that are taking place in the development of narrow AI to see what sort of path we are on, and if there is any possibility that we’d see an emergent AGI, over a course of 6 months.

Any findings are part of an ongoing hypothesis.

Speculations

  • The opportunity for an AGI lies in the distributed links that agent AIs make to perform specific tasks.
  •  No AGI is possible without memory being committed to AI agent results. 
  •  Hardware developments, and the mass deployment of, for example Nvidia DGX H100’s ,will be required for agencies to see what the scale of narrow AIs working in cooperation can bring to more general problems.
  • AI self learning, with the assumption of AI improving upon itself, is unproven. There are many assumptions being made in the AI space.
  • Conflating AI intelligence with animal/human intelligence with sentience remains a stretch at best, hyperbole and misleading at worst.
  • Calling AGI’s ‘God’ even before superintelligence is viable, is not a useful response.
  • Conflating AGIs with popular film fictional representations can be highly misleading.
  • Solving the Alignment issue is unlikely. 
  • Making AGI systems 'fit for purpose', depends upon the purpose. Expectations about purpose will have to be compromised and tailored to existing circumstance.

Legislation

  • Alignment issues will remain problematic, during the course of narrow AI development.
  • Hiding one’s head in the sand about AIs is not a useful response.
  • Legislation as an attempt to control development remains highly problematic; the documents I’ve reviewed from the USA, the EU and some of it’s member states have been inadequate, and have barely been able to understand the problems that AI threw up last year, never mind last month. AI development will now always be too fast for reactionary legislation. 
  • The winners of the productivity changes that AI brings forth will remain with the system elites that created them, so in China for example in their hybrid capitalist system, in the West an increasingly small number of the tech elite. Benefits will be highly constrained for the mass of people, and may well be detrimental to large minorities. This is not speculation.

Tools

  • Current AI tools affect ‘white collar’ work in post industrialised nations the most.
  • Current AI tools remain riddled with biases.
  • Current AI tools have data gatekeepers enacted to present ‘acceptable’ results to consumers of its services.
  • Current AI tools already increase productivity in many white collar fields, to an extent, particularly in more entry level areas, I expect this to grow significantly in the forthcoming days, weeks, months.

Critical Responses

  • We have a catch 22 situation, critical responses without an understanding of the SWOT issues narrow AI and AGI represent are unhelpful, yet keeping up with the developments may not be possible for any human.
  • As ever the range of responses is varied, from tech billionaires calling for a delay in development, under the guise of being helpful, whilst the reality is they are playing catch up, to those who are idolatrous of tech, and to institutions confined by their practicing mission.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OpenAI's NSA Appointment Raises Alarming Surveillance Concerns

  The recent appointment of General Paul Nakasone, former head of the National Security Agency (NSA), to OpenAI's board of directors has sparked widespread outrage and concern among privacy advocates and tech enthusiasts alike. Nakasone, who led the NSA from 2018 to 2023, will join OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee, tasked with enhancing AI's role in cybersecurity. However, this move has raised significant red flags, particularly given the NSA's history of mass surveillance and data collection without warrants. Critics, including Edward Snowden, have voiced their concerns that OpenAI's AI capabilities could be leveraged to strengthen the NSA's snooping network, further eroding individual privacy. Snowden has gone so far as to label the appointment a "willful, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth." The tech community is rightly alarmed, with many drawing parallels to dystopian fiction. The move has also raised questions about ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prompt Engineering: Expert Tips for a variety of Platforms

  Prompt engineering has become a crucial aspect of harnessing the full potential of AI language models. Both Google and Anthropic have recently released comprehensive guides to help users optimise their prompts for better interactions with their AI tools. What follows is a quick overview of tips drawn from these documents. And to think just a year ago there were countless YouTube videos that were promoting 'Prompt Engineering' as a job that could earn megabucks... The main providers of these 'chatbots' will hopefully get rid of this problem, soon. Currently their interfaces are akin to 1970's command lines, we've seen a regression in UI. Constructing complex prompts should be relegated to Linux lovers. Just a word of caution, even excellent prompts don't stop LLM 'hallucinations'. They can be mitigated against by supplementing a LLM with a RAG, and perhaps by 'Memory Tuning ' as suggested by Lamini (I've not tested this approach yet).  ...
Post a Comment
Read more