Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, beats out OpenAI and NVIDIA and Synthetic Data


Claude 3,5 The New 'Best' Model

Anthropic announced yesterday the launch of Claude 3.5 Sonnet, it's latest AI model. Claude 3.5 Sonnet boasts superior benchmarks, outperforming competitors and previous versions in reasoning, knowledge, coding, and content creation. Its enhanced speed and cost-effectiveness makes it a real alternative to OpenAI models. Key improvements include advanced vision capabilities, enabling tasks like chart interpretation and image transcription. A new "Artifacts" feature transforms Claude into a collaborative workspace, allowing real-time interaction with AI-generated content. Anthropic emphasises its commitment to safety and privacy, highlighting rigorous testing, external evaluations, and a policy that prioritises user privacy. Anthropic concludes by teasing upcoming releases and features, including new models and a "Memory" function, demonstrating Anthropic's commitment to continuous improvement based on user feedback.


NVIDIA's New Trainer

Alongside this was the recent announcement by NVIDIA. NVIDIA's Nemotron-4 340B family of models, is designed for Synthetic Data Generation (SDG). They emphasise the importance of high-quality data in developing accurate AI systems, particularly LLMs (Large Language Models) and SLMs (Small Language Models). Here (https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/leverage-our-latest-open-models-for-synthetic-data-generation-with-nvidia-nemotron-4-340b/) they explain how SDG can augment existing data stores by leveraging LLMs to create customised, high-quality data in large volumes. The source then delves into the specifics of the Nemotron-4 340B models, including the Reward Model and its use in ranking synthetic responses based on attributes like helpfulness and coherence. It concludes by illustrating a typical SDG pipeline, highlighting its effectiveness with a case study, and emphasising the transformative potential of SDG in enhancing various Gen AI applications.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...
Post a Comment
Read more

Podcast Soon Notice

I've been invited to make a podcast around the themes and ideas presented in this blog. More details will be announced soon. This is also your opportunity to be involved in the debate. If you have a response to any of the blog posts posted here, or consider an important issue in the debate around AGI is not being discussed, then please get in touch via the comments.  I look forward to hearing from you.
Post a Comment
Read more

AI Agents and the Latest Silicon Valley Hype

In what appears to be yet another grandiose proclamation from the tech industry, Google has released a whitepaper extolling the virtues of what they're calling "Generative AI agents". (https://www.aibase.com/news/14498) Whilst the basic premise—distinguishing between AI models and agents—holds water, one must approach these sweeping claims with considerable caution. Let's begin with the fundamentals. Yes, AI models like Large Language Models do indeed process information and generate outputs. That much isn't controversial. However, the leap from these essentially sophisticated pattern-matching systems to autonomous "agents" requires rather more scrutiny than the tech evangelists would have us believe. The whitepaper's architectural approaches—with their rather grandiose names like "ReAct" and "Tree of Thought"—sound remarkably like repackaged versions of long-standing computer science concepts, dressed up in fashionable AI clot...
Post a Comment
Read more