Skip to main content

Adobe's New Terms of Service: A Threat to Creative Control and Intellectual Property?

 

Adobe's recent update to its Terms of Service for Creative Cloud has sparked widespread concern among the creative community. The changes grant Adobe unprecedented access to users' projects, raising questions about privacy, copyright, and the very ownership of creative work. In this post, we'll delve into the key objections and legal implications of these new terms, and what they mean for professionals and individuals alike.


Access to User Content: A Privacy Concern?

Adobe's updated Terms of Service grant the company the right to access users' projects through automated and manual methods. While Adobe justifies this access as necessary for responding to support requests, detecting technical issues, and addressing security concerns, many users are uneasy about the potential for privacy violations and the unauthorised use of copyrighted material. This lack of transparency has led to fears that Adobe may use users' work to train its AI systems without their consent, potentially violating non-disclosure agreements and copyright laws.


Licensing and Ownership: Who Holds the Reins?

The Terms of Service grant Adobe a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to use, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, create derivative works, publicly perform, and translate users' content. This has significant implications for creators, as it raises questions about the ownership and control of their work. The lack of clear language in the Terms of Use to prevent unauthorised AI training has added to the concern and mistrust among users.


Lack of Transparency and Trust: A Breakdown in Communication?

The absence of clear language in the Terms of Use to prevent unauthorised AI training and the inability to contact support staff without agreeing to the new terms first have added to the concern and mistrust among users. The mandatory approval process, which forces users to accept the new terms to continue using Adobe's services, has been seen as coercive and has further fuelled the outrage.


Impact on Professional Users: A Threat to Confidentiality?

The changes have significant implications for professionals under non-disclosure agreements, as Adobe's access to their content could potentially violate these agreements, leaving users in a difficult position. Photojournalists, in particular, are concerned about the liability this poses for their work.


Legal Implications: A Minefield for Creators?

The updated Terms of Service have raised questions about the legal implications for creators, including the potential for copyright infringement and the unauthorised use of their work. The reduction in the dispute resolution period from 60 days to 30 days has also been seen as a concern.


Conclusion: A Call to Action for Creators?

Adobe's new Terms of Service have sparked a heated debate about the balance between creative control and the use of cloud-based services. As the creative community continues to grapple with these changes, it is essential for users to understand the implications of these terms and to demand greater transparency and accountability from Adobe. Alternatively, and a position I undertook over a decade ago, find alternative software vendors, and always read the Terms Of Service first.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OpenAI's NSA Appointment Raises Alarming Surveillance Concerns

  The recent appointment of General Paul Nakasone, former head of the National Security Agency (NSA), to OpenAI's board of directors has sparked widespread outrage and concern among privacy advocates and tech enthusiasts alike. Nakasone, who led the NSA from 2018 to 2023, will join OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee, tasked with enhancing AI's role in cybersecurity. However, this move has raised significant red flags, particularly given the NSA's history of mass surveillance and data collection without warrants. Critics, including Edward Snowden, have voiced their concerns that OpenAI's AI capabilities could be leveraged to strengthen the NSA's snooping network, further eroding individual privacy. Snowden has gone so far as to label the appointment a "willful, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth." The tech community is rightly alarmed, with many drawing parallels to dystopian fiction. The move has also raised questions about ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prompt Engineering: Expert Tips for a variety of Platforms

  Prompt engineering has become a crucial aspect of harnessing the full potential of AI language models. Both Google and Anthropic have recently released comprehensive guides to help users optimise their prompts for better interactions with their AI tools. What follows is a quick overview of tips drawn from these documents. And to think just a year ago there were countless YouTube videos that were promoting 'Prompt Engineering' as a job that could earn megabucks... The main providers of these 'chatbots' will hopefully get rid of this problem, soon. Currently their interfaces are akin to 1970's command lines, we've seen a regression in UI. Constructing complex prompts should be relegated to Linux lovers. Just a word of caution, even excellent prompts don't stop LLM 'hallucinations'. They can be mitigated against by supplementing a LLM with a RAG, and perhaps by 'Memory Tuning ' as suggested by Lamini (I've not tested this approach yet).  ...
Post a Comment
Read more