Skip to main content

Protecting People, not profits

 


Protecting data. That's been the principle focus of tech regulation for decades. Protecting people hasn't. This should teach us a valuable lesson. Matt Clifford, an advisor to the UK Prime Minister, today stated in an interview: "We have got two years to get in place a framework that makes both controlling and regulating very large models much more possible than it is today." Earlier in the interview Clifford set out why this timescale is important, "if we don't start to think about safety then in about two years time we will be finding that we have systems that are very powerful indeed." But many have been thinking about safety in these systems, for a very long time. There are existing laws in the UK and most countries that could be enacted now, which are rarely enforced, around privacy of data as an example. 

Clifford though is misunderstanding the risks and the sector. The uncensored LLMs, that pose a national security risk, are in the Open Source arena, and can give one the formula for neurotoxins amongst many other dangerous chemical compounds. But so can books!  The challenge has been more about resources, about regulators having the people power, money and authority to intervene. The other challenge, a more significant one, is the concern of regulators to protect monopolistic concerns, to protect data, more than people, to enforce corporate rights rather than human rights.

Until this balance is reversed then there will be no effective protection that deals with AI. The other significant area of regulation has been around corporations, of course. But these fail constantly, largely as laws are there ultimately to aid larger corporations. Big Tech companies are constantly looking for ways to stay ahead of the competition. One of their most effective strategies is to invest in startups. Apple, for example, brought 50 different AI companies between 20/22.

Startups are often under the radar and largely unregulated. This gives Big Tech a chance to get in on the ground floor of new technologies and markets. Once a startup has developed a successful product or service, Big Tech can then acquire it or integrate it into their own business.

This strategy has allowed Big Tech to grow their market power and influence at an unprecedented rate. In recent years, Big Tech companies have come under increasing scrutiny for their monopolistic practices. However, they have so far been able to avoid significant regulation.

This is where you come in. As a consumer, you have the power to hold Big Tech accountable. You can choose to use products and services from companies that are committed to protecting your privacy and respecting your human rights. You can also support organisations that are fighting for stronger regulations on Big Tech. For those of you that are using ChatGPT without ever having read the terms of service, for example, which are pretty shocking, I'd urge you to read them, and seek to understand the implications of section 8 for instance.

Be highly skeptical about any company that requires a lot of your personal information, that wants to scan every eyeball in the world in order to enact it's own crypto currency, for example.

Rather than rushing to implement new forms of global governance around AI, insist on your legislators enact existing laws effectively first, to mitigate against the current dangers AI tools present now, which are many and varied. Then, when legislators consider AI regulation people have to come first, to be effective it should empower human rights.

Together, we can make sure that Big Tech doesn't use its power to exploit us. We can demand that they be held accountable for their actions and that they operate in a way that benefits all of us, not just their shareholders.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their
Post a Comment
Read more

Beware the Orca, the challenge to ChatGPT and Palm2 is here

  So Google's 'we have no moat' paper was correct. If you train an LLM wisely then it's cost effective and cheap to produce a small LLM that is able to compete or even beat established, costly LLMs, as Microsoft has just found. It's another excellent video from AI Explained, who goes through some of the training procedures, which I won't get into here. Orca, is a model that learns from large foundation models (LFMs) like GPT-4 and ChatGPT by imitating their reasoning process. Orca uses rich signals such as explanations and complex instructions to improve its performance on various tasks. Orca outperforms other instruction-tuned models and achieves similar results to ChatGPT on zero-shot reasoning benchmarks and professional and academic exams. The paper suggests that learning from explanations is a promising way to enhance model skills. Smaller models are often overestimated in their abilities compared to LFMs, and need more rigorous evaluation methods. Explana
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in
Post a Comment
Read more