Skip to main content

Merging with AI, the Transhumanists gamble

 


In his presentation on 17 July 2019, Elon Musk said that ultimately he wants “to achieve a symbiosis with artificial intelligence.” Even in a “benign scenario,” humans would be “left behind.” Musk wants to create technology that allows a “merging with AI.”

Neuralink is a revolutionary technology that aims to connect your brain to a computer. Imagine being able to control your devices, access information, and communicate with others using only your thoughts. The firm plans to insert a sensor smaller than a fingertip, possibly with only local anesthesia. A complex robot will implant thin wires or threads in brain regions that control movement and sensation. The implant is connected to a wireless device that processes and transmits your neural signals to your phone or computer via Bluetooth.

Neuralink's vision is to create a symbiosis with artificial intelligence, where humans can enhance their abilities and keep up with the rapid advances of technology. Neuralink's founder, Elon Musk, said in a presentation in 2019 that he wants to help people who suffer from paralysis, blindness, and other neurological disorders by restoring their sensory and motor functions. He also said that Neuralink could create new sensations and experiences by stimulating different parts of the brain.

In other words, Neuralink fits Julian Huxley's concept of transhumanism and challenges the traditional notion of what it means to be human. It blurs the boundaries between the natural and the artificial, the self and the other, the mind and the machine. Neuralink devices question René Descartes' famous statement "cogito, ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am). I think, but are the thoughts really mine?

In late May of 2023 Neuralink’s FDA approval was approved from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to conduct its first tests on humans. 

A clinical trial for the device in humans is no guarantee of regulatory or commercial success. Neuralink will face intense scrutiny by the FDA and ethical and security questions. The company has also drawn criticism for its research on animals from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

Some of the possible procedural risks are:

  • Injury to the facial nerve --this nerve goes through the middle ear to give movement to the muscles of the face.
  • Meningitis --this is an infection of the lining of the surface of the brain.
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leakage --the brain is surrounded by fluid that may leak from a hole in the skull or dura mater (the protective layer around the brain) caused by the implant.
  • Perilymph fluid leak --the inner ear or cochlea contains fluid that may leak into the middle ear due to damage from the implant.
  • Brain hemorrhage --this is bleeding in the brain that can cause stroke or death.
  • Infection --this is a risk of any surgical procedure and can lead to complications such as abscess formation or device malfunction.
  • Device malfunction --this can occur due to mechanical failure, battery depletion, lead fracture, or electromagnetic interference.
  • Lack of benefit for certain symptoms --this can happen if the implant does not target the correct brain area or does not provide adequate stimulation.
  • Worsening mental or emotional status --this can occur due to changes in brain activity, medication adjustments, or psychological factors related to having an implant.
  • Migration of the implant --this can happen if the implant is not fixed securely and moves within the brain tissue, causing damage or loss of function.
  • Unwanted tissue reactions --this can happen if the implant causes inflammation, scarring, or foreign body response in the surrounding brain tissue, affecting its performance and biocompatibility.
In the paper 'A Critique of Transhumanism,' Diederich concludes:
If the connection between human activity and reward is weakened or eliminated, psychological and behavioral problems arise. The use of illicit drugs is one example: drugs like cocaine have an immediate impact on the brain’s reward system. Frequent users are seeking the drug directly in order to obtain pleasure and reward without having to engage in behaviour that offers exceptional satisfaction without chemical stimulus. Brain machine interfaces such as the one proposed by Neuralink risk to weaken or destroy the fundamental connection between behaviour and reward.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their
Post a Comment
Read more

Beware the Orca, the challenge to ChatGPT and Palm2 is here

  So Google's 'we have no moat' paper was correct. If you train an LLM wisely then it's cost effective and cheap to produce a small LLM that is able to compete or even beat established, costly LLMs, as Microsoft has just found. It's another excellent video from AI Explained, who goes through some of the training procedures, which I won't get into here. Orca, is a model that learns from large foundation models (LFMs) like GPT-4 and ChatGPT by imitating their reasoning process. Orca uses rich signals such as explanations and complex instructions to improve its performance on various tasks. Orca outperforms other instruction-tuned models and achieves similar results to ChatGPT on zero-shot reasoning benchmarks and professional and academic exams. The paper suggests that learning from explanations is a promising way to enhance model skills. Smaller models are often overestimated in their abilities compared to LFMs, and need more rigorous evaluation methods. Explana
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in
Post a Comment
Read more