You can fool some of the people all of the time: AIs and deception

Two papers that each consider trust and AIs are of interest, the first is 'Suspicious Minds: The Problem of Trust and Conversational Agents' by Jonas Ivarsson, University of Gothenburg. The second by Rogers and Webber, "Lying About Lying: Examining Trust Repair Strategies After Robot Deception in a High Stakes HRI Scenario".

Artificial intelligence is getting so good at talking that it's hard to tell the difference between humans and machines.

It can now be difficult to know who you're talking to. 'Consequently, the ‘Turing test’ has moved from the laboratory into the wild', as Ivarsson states, If you think you're talking to a human, but it's actually a machine, you might share personal information that you wouldn't want to share with a machine.

This is also a problem because it can erode trust in human-to-human interactions. If people can't tell the difference between humans and machines, they might start to distrust each other.

'Therefore, this study concludes that the proliferation of conversational systems, fueled by artificial intelligence, may have unintended consequences, including impacts on human–human interactions.'

The issues that Ivarsson explored are only exacerbated by the topic of the second paper, as Webber states in this:

"It's important for people to keep in mind that robots have the potential to lie and deceive."

This study looked at how humans react when a robot lies to them. The study found that people are more likely to change their behavior if they are told that the robot is lying, and that an apology without acknowledging intentional deception is the best way to repair trust.

Designers and policy makers need to consider GPTs current abilities to deceive and what the implications are, even before we get to robots.

In two to three years time, as manufacturers imbue more and more of your everyday technology with AI 'assistants', your phones, cars, TVs, etcetera, and you realise that they are lying to you, what will the human response be? Will their apologies be sufficient?

Comments

OpenAI's NSA Appointment Raises Alarming Surveillance Concerns

The recent appointment of General Paul Nakasone, former head of the National Security Agency (NSA), to OpenAI's board of directors has sparked widespread outrage and concern among privacy advocates and tech enthusiasts alike. Nakasone, who led the NSA from 2018 to 2023, will join OpenAI's Safety and Security Committee, tasked with enhancing AI's role in cybersecurity. However, this move has raised significant red flags, particularly given the NSA's history of mass surveillance and data collection without warrants. Critics, including Edward Snowden, have voiced their concerns that OpenAI's AI capabilities could be leveraged to strengthen the NSA's snooping network, further eroding individual privacy. Snowden has gone so far as to label the appointment a "willful, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth." The tech community is rightly alarmed, with many drawing parallels to dystopian fiction. The move has also raised questions about ...

What is happening inside of the black box?

Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties. Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in ...

Prompt Engineering: Expert Tips for a variety of Platforms

Prompt engineering has become a crucial aspect of harnessing the full potential of AI language models. Both Google and Anthropic have recently released comprehensive guides to help users optimise their prompts for better interactions with their AI tools. What follows is a quick overview of tips drawn from these documents. And to think just a year ago there were countless YouTube videos that were promoting 'Prompt Engineering' as a job that could earn megabucks... The main providers of these 'chatbots' will hopefully get rid of this problem, soon. Currently their interfaces are akin to 1970's command lines, we've seen a regression in UI. Constructing complex prompts should be relegated to Linux lovers. Just a word of caution, even excellent prompts don't stop LLM 'hallucinations'. They can be mitigated against by supplementing a LLM with a RAG, and perhaps by 'Memory Tuning ' as suggested by Lamini (I've not tested this approach yet). ...

Charting the emergence of AGI?

Search This Blog