Skip to main content

What can Faraday teach us about human responses to AI?


Professor Simone Natale argues that AI resides also, and especially, in the perception of human users. This talk presents materials from his new monograph, Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. This talk is from two years ago and doesn't seem to have attracted the attention it deserves, but serves well today.

Natale begins with an analogy, and a warning from history:

In the middle of the 19th century, a new religious movement called spiritualism began to attract attention. Spiritualists believed that they could communicate with the spirits of the dead, and they would hold seances where they would try to contact the deceased.

One of the leading scientific figures of the time, Michael Faraday, was skeptical of spiritualism. He decided to investigate the matter by conducting experiments and observing seances.

Faraday's investigation led him to conclude that the phenomena at seances were not caused by spirits, but by the participants themselves. He found that people were more likely to experience paranormal phenomena when they were in a suggestible state, such as when they were tired or in a dark room.

Faraday's findings helped to debunk spiritualism, but they also raised questions about the nature of perception and reality. If people can be so easily deceived by their own minds, what else might they be mistaken about?

Faraday's work suggests that we should be careful about what we believe, and that we should always be open to the possibility that we may be wrong.

Natale goes on to talk about talking about the importance of media literacy and how it can help us to understand and critically evaluate the information that we consume.

Whilst on the one hand, AI can be used to create powerful tools that can improve our lives in many ways. On the other hand, AI can also be used to manipulate and deceive us.

Natale argues that it is important to be aware of the potential risks of AI and to use it responsibly. They also suggest that we need to develop new ways of thinking about and interacting with AI in order to maximize its benefits and minimize its risks.

Natale makes a convincing argument that media literacy is essential in the age of AI. AI is becoming increasingly sophisticated, and it is important to be able to critically evaluate the information that we consume, whether it is generated by humans or machines.

Natale also raises some important concerns about the potential risks of AI. They point out that AI can be used to manipulate and deceive us, and that we need to be aware of these risks in order to use AI responsibly. Unfortunately 'Media Studies' is often derided as a 'Mickey Mouse' subject, yet its ability to develop critical thinking as regards the media we consume is going to be more significant now than its ever been. It may only prove a mitigation against the intentional, and inherent, deceptions of AI generated media, but without such mitigations the influences of felonious intents will go unchecked.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their
Post a Comment
Read more

Beware the Orca, the challenge to ChatGPT and Palm2 is here

  So Google's 'we have no moat' paper was correct. If you train an LLM wisely then it's cost effective and cheap to produce a small LLM that is able to compete or even beat established, costly LLMs, as Microsoft has just found. It's another excellent video from AI Explained, who goes through some of the training procedures, which I won't get into here. Orca, is a model that learns from large foundation models (LFMs) like GPT-4 and ChatGPT by imitating their reasoning process. Orca uses rich signals such as explanations and complex instructions to improve its performance on various tasks. Orca outperforms other instruction-tuned models and achieves similar results to ChatGPT on zero-shot reasoning benchmarks and professional and academic exams. The paper suggests that learning from explanations is a promising way to enhance model skills. Smaller models are often overestimated in their abilities compared to LFMs, and need more rigorous evaluation methods. Explana
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in
Post a Comment
Read more