Skip to main content

Palantir and their new AIP, chat courtesy of "a scary business"

 




Palantir Technologies, a software company that specialises in analysing, integrating, and presenting vast amounts of data, has launched the Palantir Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP). The AIP was showcased in a video released by the company last Tuesday.



The AIP is a powerful tool that can be used to make 'better' decisions in a variety of settings, including the military. In the video, Palantir showed how the AIP could be used to help a military operator monitor the Eastern European theatre and respond to a perceived threat. The operator was monitoring satellite imagery when they noticed a large concentration of enemy forces gathering near the border. The AIP quickly analysed the situation and proposed a number of tactical responses. For example, the AIP could be used to launch a drone to gather more information about the enemy forces, or to coordinate airstrikes. The AIP can also utilise other Palantir tools, such as Project Maven, DoD project to develop artificial intelligence for analysing drone footage. 

Palantir has also developed the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node, or TITAN, a truck that fuses intelligence from a host of sources. The AIP is still under development, but it has the potential to revolutionise the way the military makes decisions. By providing real-time analysis of vast amounts of data, the AIP can help military commanders make 'better' decisions faster. Palantir is not the only company developing AI-powered tools for the military. Other companies, such as Google and Microsoft, are also working on similar projects. However, Palantir is one of the leaders in this field, and its AIP is one of the most advanced AI platforms available. 

The development of AI-powered tools for the military will always be controversial. The debate over the use of AI in warfare is likely to continue for some time. However, it is clear that AI is already having a significant impact on the military, and its role is only going to grow in the years to come.

According to Defense One 'Palantir CEO Alex Karp showed up in Ukraine this week for a meeting with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov said that Karp is the first CEO to visit Kyiv since Russia’s invasion in late February. “Impressive support and faith in credibility of investments: agreed on office opening and digital support of Army,” Federov tweeted. Palantir told Bloomberg that Karp discussed how the company “can continue to use its technology to support Ukraine.”

Given this, one can only assume that AIP is battle tested. Defense One have an interesting range of stories on this company, for those that want to dig beyond the scope of this blog.
Palantir, history

"They're in a scary business," says Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Lee Tien. ACLU analyst Jay Stanley has written that Palantir's software could enable a "true totalitarian nightmare, monitoring the activities of innocent Americans on a mass scale."

There's reason for such comments. The cofounders of the company Thiel and Karp both have, shall we say, an interesting backstory. PayPal cofounder Peter Thiel had cofounded PayPal and sold it to eBay in October 2002 for $1.5 billion. Thiel, was also the first big investor in Facebook, he has sold most of his stake in the social network. Other investments include in Space X and Stipe.

He went on to create a hedge fund, Clarium Capita, and continued to found new companies: One would become Palantir, named by Thiel for the 'Palantiri seeing stones from J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, orbs that allow the holder to gaze across vast distances to track friends and foes.' Thiel wanted to utilise the anti-fraud software from PayPal to help stop terrorist attacks.

Thiel has emerged as a major donor to Republican candidates and campaigns in the 2022 election cycle, according to OpenSecrets. He has donated more than $35 million to 16 federal-level Republicans, including some who are challenging incumbent senators and representatives, through Thiel Capital. Thiel's political spending has increased significantly since 2016, when he gave $1.25 million to support Donald Trump's presidential bid. He also backed libertarian Ron Paul in 2012.

Thiel has had a decades long friendship with Karp, starting at Stanford Law School. The two quickly got investment from the CIA, via In-Q-Tel, the CIA's investment arm. They continued being the sole funder of Palantir from from 2005 to 2008.
 

In-Q-Tel

Was founded in 1999. In-Q-Tel's investment strategy is focused on three broad areas:

Software: In-Q-Tel invests in software companies that are developing innovative technologies in areas such as big data, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity.
  • Infrastructure: In-Q-Tel invests in infrastructure companies that are developing new technologies for areas such as cloud computing, data storage, and networking.
  • Materials sciences: In-Q-Tel invests in materials sciences companies that are developing new materials with applications in areas such as sensors, energy storage, and biomedicine.
Since its founding, In-Q-Tel has invested in over 200 companies, including some of the most successful technology companies in the world, such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter. In-Q-Tel's investments have helped to accelerate the development of technologies that have benefited the intelligence community and the military.

Palantir and the UK

The company already has deep roots within the UK government. This isn't a secret, although it's very under reported. Vice Media, Byline Times and OpenDemocracy have been the main organisations that have looked at this, particularly their contracts over NHS data being processed by Palantir. Click on the links to see the search history of what these media outlets have written. Some excellent journalism is available!

If you wish to see (some of) the extensive list of contracts they have with the UK government, then the contracts finder service is a fine start.


A January 23 FOI request to Defra produced the following, somewhat opaque, response:

"Also, in an agreement with Crown Commercial Services for the supply of 'back office software', of which Palantir helped platform build as part of a framework agreement, the posted customer list for said software includes:
1. Any of the following:
a) Ministerial government departments;
b) Non ministerial government departments;
c) Executive agencies of government;
d) Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs), including advisory NDPBs, executive
NDPBs, and tribunal NDPBs;
e) Assembly Sponsored Public Bodies (ASPBs);
f) Police forces;
g) Fire and rescue services;
h) Ambulance services;
i) Maritime and coastguard agency services;
j) NHS bodies;
k) Educational bodies or establishments including state schools (nursery schools,
primary schools, middle or high schools, secondary schools, special schools),
academies, colleges, Pupil Referral Unit (PRU), further education colleges and
universities;
l) Hospices;
m) National Parks;
n) Housing associations, including registered social landlords;
o) Third sector and charities;
p) Citizens advice bodies;
q) Councils, including county councils, district councils, county borough councils,
community councils, London borough councils, unitary councils, metropolitan
councils, parish councils;
r) Public corporations;
s) Public financial bodies or institutions;
t) Public pension funds;
u) Central banks; and
v) Civil service bodies, including public sector buying organisations"


Then there is the Ministry of Defence. On Palantir's own website they state:
Worth £75 million over three years, the partnership will support the MOD's digital transformation as it becomes a world-leading agile force of the future. Spearheaded by Defence Digital and powered by Palantir, the digital transformation will see the MOD treat data as a strategic asset, harnessing its power to deliver superior military advantage and greater efficiency across the enterprise, from headquarters to the front lines.
I can only wonder if the £900 million BRITGPT, as reportedly announced by the government might be contracted out, in part at least, to "a scary business".

I will leave you to ponder upon the increasing roles than Palantir is undertaking in NATO governments, and their allies. Hopefully I have done my bit in prompting some further investigation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Whispers in the Machine: Why Prompt Injection Remains a Persistent Threat to LLMs

 Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming how we interact with technology, offering incredible potential for tasks ranging from content creation to complex analysis. However, as these powerful tools become more integrated into our lives, so too do the novel security challenges they present. Among these, prompt injection attacks stand out as a particularly persistent and evolving threat. These attacks, as one recent paper (Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05206) highlights, involve subtly manipulating LLMs to deviate from their intended purpose, and the methods are becoming increasingly sophisticated. At its core, a prompt injection attack involves embedding a malicious instruction within an otherwise normal request, tricking the LLM into producing unintended – and potentially harmful – outputs. Think of it as slipping a secret, contradictory instruction into a seemingly harmless conversation. What makes prompt inj...

The Future of Work in the Age of AGI: Opportunities, Challenges, and Resistance

 In recent years, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked intense debate about the future of work. As we edge closer to the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI), these discussions have taken on a new urgency. This post explores various perspectives on employment in a post-AGI world, including the views of those who may resist such changes. It follows on from others I've written on the impacts of these technologies. The Potential for Widespread Job Displacement Avital Balwit, an employee at Anthropic, argues in her article " My Last Five Years of Work " that AGI is likely to cause significant job displacement across various sectors, including knowledge-based professions. This aligns with research by Korinek (2024), which suggests that the transition to AGI could trigger a race between automation and capital accumulation, potentially leading to a collapse in wages for many workers. Emerging Opportunities and Challenges Despite the ...

Can We Build a Safe Superintelligence? Safe Superintelligence Inc. Raises Intriguing Questions

  Safe Superintelligence Inc . (SSI) has burst onto the scene with a bold mission: to create the world's first safe superintelligence (SSI). Their (Ilya Sutskever, Daniel Gross, Daniel Levy) ambition is undeniable, but before we all sign up to join their "cracked team," let's delve deeper into the potential issues with their approach. One of the most critical questions is defining "safe" superintelligence. What values would guide this powerful AI? How can we ensure it aligns with the complex and often contradictory desires of humanity?  After all, "safe" for one person might mean environmental protection, while another might prioritise economic growth, even if it harms the environment.  Finding universal values that a superintelligence could adhere to is a significant hurdle that SSI hasn't fully addressed. Another potential pitfall lies in SSI's desire to rapidly advance capabilities while prioritising safety.  Imagine a Formula One car wi...