Skip to main content

Hinton, a warning that should attract attention

 


Elon Musk warning about the dangers of AI, and calling for a six month pause in its development can be easily dismissed, after all he threatened to launch his own 'truth' anti-GPT4. Even, with all due respect, can the calls of the Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak. But when Dr Hinton, 'the godfather of AI' highlights the dangers of AI, his work in the field deserves respect, and subsequently so do the warnings he provides. 

Hinton's research investigates ways of using neural networks for machine learning, memory, perception, and symbol processing. He has authored or co-authored more than 200 peer reviewed publications. 

Hinton has claimed that Google had previously acted as a steward of AI development, carefully testing its work before launching a product into the public domain. Due to Microsoft's involvement with Open AI, and the subsequent launch of a GPT agent into its Edge browser, Google have launched Bard as it's early foray into the field. It won't be the last product it launches this year. 

In 2021 Google announced it's development of MUM, which it described as 'A new AI milestone for understanding information' 

MUM not only understands language, but also generates it. It’s trained across 75 different languages and many different tasks at once, allowing it to develop a more comprehensive understanding of information and world knowledge than previous models. And MUM is multimodal, so it understands information across text and images and, in the future, can expand to more modalities like video and audio.

From it's position as a leader in generative AI Google has suddenly found it was playing second fiddle to Microsoft. Hinton has stated as companies improve their AI systems, he believes, they become increasingly dangerous. “Look at how it was five years ago and how it is now,”. “Take the difference and propagate it forwards. That’s scary.” 

Hinton, quite rightly, has warned about the dangers of the misinformation / propaganda inherent in the generative tools, as have been repeatedly mentioned in this blog, he states the average person will “not be able to know what is true anymore.”

Indeed, elections will never be the same again.

In the interview Hinton warns about the dangers of AI to the job market, there are various estimates from the likes of PwC about this. By the mid 2030's most predictions state that between 30% to 50% of all jobs will be affected if not lost. 

Considering a future beyond this, Hinton, a long time advocate against the military development of AI said: “The idea that this stuff could actually get smarter than people — a few people believed that,”  “But most people thought it was way off. And I thought it was way off. I thought it was 30 to 50 years or even longer away. Obviously, I no longer think that.”

This needs to be understood in the light of Google's (and others) robot developments:


Given the totally inadequate governmental responses to legislation as a means of ensuring AI safety, which as even Bard said of the UK's white paper are, 'too slow and too bureaucratic' then the public conversation is acutely necessary. 





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their
Post a Comment
Read more

Beware the Orca, the challenge to ChatGPT and Palm2 is here

  So Google's 'we have no moat' paper was correct. If you train an LLM wisely then it's cost effective and cheap to produce a small LLM that is able to compete or even beat established, costly LLMs, as Microsoft has just found. It's another excellent video from AI Explained, who goes through some of the training procedures, which I won't get into here. Orca, is a model that learns from large foundation models (LFMs) like GPT-4 and ChatGPT by imitating their reasoning process. Orca uses rich signals such as explanations and complex instructions to improve its performance on various tasks. Orca outperforms other instruction-tuned models and achieves similar results to ChatGPT on zero-shot reasoning benchmarks and professional and academic exams. The paper suggests that learning from explanations is a promising way to enhance model skills. Smaller models are often overestimated in their abilities compared to LFMs, and need more rigorous evaluation methods. Explana
Post a Comment
Read more

What is happening inside of the black box?

  Neel Nanda is involved in Mechanistic Interpretability research at DeepMind, formerly of AnthropicAI, what's fascinating about the research conducted by Nanda is he gets to peer into the Black Box to figure out how different types of AI models work. Anyone concerned with AI should understand how important this is. In this video Nanda discusses some of his findings, including 'induction heads', which turn out to have some vital properties.  Induction heads are a type of attention head that allows a language model to learn long-range dependencies in text. They do this by using a simple algorithm to complete token sequences like [A][B] ... [A] -> [B]. For example, if a model is given the sequence "The cat sat on the mat," it can use induction heads to predict that the word "mat" will be followed by the word "the". Induction heads were first discovered in 2022 by a team of researchers at OpenAI. They found that induction heads were present in
Post a Comment
Read more