Greg Brockman, TED and PR

Brockman ends the talk with the most telling of comments. "And if there's one thing to take away from this talk is that this technology just looks different. Just different from anything people had anticipated. And so we all have to become literate. (My emphasis) And that's, honestly, one of the reasons we released ChatGPT. Together. I believe we can achieve the OpenAI mission of ensuring that Artificial General Intelligence benefits all of humanity". Cue standing ovation.

The talk itself was about the wonders and not so wonderous failures of ChatGPT (hence the call for human Guinea Pigs, beta testers, consumers, and importantly advocates) which is obviously far from an AGI in its current state. The wonderous thing was the rhetorical strategy of pathos employed, a call to humans affection for their animal pets, in 'how GPT4 helped save my dogs life'.

Pathos is a rhetorical strategy that aims to persuade an audience by evoking emotions such as pity, fear, or joy. Brookman steered well clear of one of these emotions. The other two 'pillars of public speaking, ethos (appeal to credibility) and logos (appeal to logic) were implied by his status and TED, as much as anything said in the content.

The purpose of using emotional appeal in PR is to sway the audience's emotions and make them feel a certain way about a product, service, or idea. Emotional appeals are directed towards the audience's emotions and use manipulation of the recipient's emotions rather than valid logic to win an argument. The argument, of course was only revealed at the end, that users should help OpenAI (profit and) ensure AGI.

I'm not buying it.

Comments

The AI Dilemma and "Gollem-Class" AIs

From the Center for Humane Technology Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin discuss how existing A.I. capabilities already pose catastrophic risks to a functional society, how A.I. companies are caught in a race to deploy as quickly as possible without adequate safety measures, and what it would mean to upgrade our institutions to a post-A.I. world. This presentation is from a private gathering in San Francisco on March 9th with leading technologists and decision-makers with the ability to influence the future of large-language model A.I.s. This presentation was given before the launch of GPT-4. One of the more astute critics of the tech industry, Tristan Harris, who has recently given stark evidence to Congress. It is worth watching both of these videos, as the Congress address gives a context of PR industry and it's regular abuses. "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their...

A Network Analysis Tool to help identify structural gaps

InfraNodus is a web-based open source tool and method for generating insight from any text or discourse using text network analysis. The byline on the website states, 'Get an overview of any discourse, reveal the blind spots, enhance your perspective.' which, whilst accurate does little to summarise the potential of such a tool. Watching the introduction helps. Its capabilities include representing any text as a network and identifying the most influential words in a discourse based on the terms' co-occurrence, providing text network visualization and analysis live as new data is added, offering discourse structure analysis to measure the level of bias in discourse and identify structural gaps in discourse, and being available via an API to be used in conjunction with other text mining and analysis software. The white paper, ' Generating Insight Using Text Network Analysis ' concludes: 'The tool is currently used by researchers, marketing professionals, stude...

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, literary analysis capabilities, an experiment

There are those in the AI observer community that have been suggesting of late that 'AI has plateaued' which reveals, to me, a lack of understanding of how models develop. It's not iterative design but step changes we are witnessing. The differences between Claude 3 Sonnet and 3.5 Sonnet are stark. One test I often carry out to asses the current capabilities of LLMs is to request a simple prompt to analyse an unpublished poem, commentating on the style and literary devices employed. The outputs have improved significantly over the 18 months I have employed this approach. This is my recent attempt. The poem is self written, self published (so not widely available) to ensure that it's unlikely to have found its way into the training data. For added context, implied in the text, this was written during a residency at a Museum and Art Gallery and came from a conversation with a member of staff about his late father. Calm is museum archival software. PROMPT. "analyse...

Charting the emergence of AGI?

Search This Blog